When a criminal case winds its way through the lower courts, many defendants cling to the hope that if they lose, they have an automatic right to have their case heard by the “highest court in the land.” In 2026, however, the reality of the appellate system remains a harsh wake-up call for many: for the vast majority of cases, the road ends long before it reaches the top.
Both the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (TCCA) and the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) operate primarily under a system of discretionary review. Simply put, they are not required to hear your case. They choose their docket, and they reject over 95% of the requests they receive.
At Ordiway PLLC, we believe that understanding this “gatekeeper” function is the first step in a successful long-term defense strategy. It is why crafting a compelling Petition for Review is just as vital as arguing the merits of the appeal itself.
The Purpose of Discretionary Review: Law Declaration vs. Error Correction
Why do these high courts have the power to pick and choose? The answer lies in their distinct role in the judicial hierarchy.
- Error Correction (Intermediate Courts): The intermediate Courts of Appeals (like the Fifth Court of Appeals in Dallas) are tasked with ensuring the trial court followed existing rules. If a judge made a mistake, these courts are there to fix it.
- Law Declaration (High Courts): The TCCA and SCOTUS are different. Their primary job is not just to fix individual errors, but to declare and clarify the law for everyone. They step in to resolve conflicts between lower courts, address novel legal questions (such as those involving new technologies or statutes), and ensure uniformity.
If every case could be appealed “as a matter of right,” these high courts would be paralyzed by the volume, unable to give complex constitutional issues the attention they deserve.
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (TCCA) in 2026
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is the court of last resort for all criminal matters in Texas. Unlike the Texas Supreme Court, which handles only civil cases, the TCCA focuses exclusively on criminal law.
How to Get In: The Petition for Discretionary Review (PDR)
Unless you are appealing a death penalty conviction (which has an automatic right of review), you must file a Petition for Discretionary Review (PDR) to be heard by the TCCA.
- The “Rule of Four”: Just like the U.S. Supreme Court, the TCCA typically grants review only if four of the nine judges vote to hear the case.
- The Odds: In recent terms, including 2024-2025, the TCCA has granted review in fewer than 5% of the thousands of petitions filed.
- What They Look For: The Court is looking for cases that present broad, statewide importance—not just a claim that the lower court “got it wrong.” Recent 2025 decisions, such as Navarro v. State and Kitchens v. State, illustrate the Court’s focus on clarifying statutory interpretations and constitutional protections that affect every Texan, not just the individual defendant.
The United States Supreme Court: The Final Arbiter
The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest court in the federal judiciary. Its decisions on federal questions and the U.S. Constitution are binding on all other courts, including the TCCA.
How to Get In: The Writ of Certiorari
To get your case before SCOTUS, you must file a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. The hurdle here is even higher than in Texas.
- Extreme Selectivity: For the 2024-2025 term, the Supreme Court agreed to hear only about 65 cases out of the roughly 7,000 petitions filed—a grant rate of approximately 1%.
- Supreme Court Rule 10: This rule explicitly states that a petition is rarely granted when the asserted error consists of “erroneous factual findings or the misapplication of a properly stated rule of law.” Instead, the Court looks for “compelling reasons,” such as:
- Circuit Splits: When two different federal circuit courts disagree on the same issue.
- State Court Conflicts: When a state high court (like the TCCA) decides a federal question in a way that conflicts with another state high court or SCOTUS precedent.
Why You Need a Specialist for the “Gatekeeper” Stage
Because the odds are so steep, the strategy for a PDR or Cert Petition is fundamentally different from a standard appeal. It is not enough to argue that you are innocent or that the trial was unfair. You must convince the high court that your case matters to the system as a whole.
At Ordiway PLLC, we specialize in identifying the specific “hooks”—whether it’s a split in authority, a novel constitutional question, or a departure from accepted judicial practice—that catch the attention of the Justices.
Don’t let your case end quietly. If you have received an unfavorable decision from a lower appellate court, contact us today to discuss your options for discretionary review.
Related Practice Areas:
Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique, and you should consult with a qualified attorney to discuss your specific situation.